RAMAPHOSA WARNS AGAINST ILLEGAL LAND SEIZURES

CAPE TOWN– South African President Cyril Ramaphosa says the expropriation of land without compensation is constitutional, but illegal land seizures will not be allowed.

He was appearing before the National Assembly here Wednesday for his first oral question and answer session since being elected President on Feb 15. The Democratic Alliance (DA), the main opposition party, had asked Ramaphosa for details of the government’s plan to expropriate land without compensation.

Ramaphosa said the government’s land audit had revealed that white people still own around 72 per cent of farms which are individually owned.

He insists that the expropriation of land without compensation is constitutional. The opportunity we have is to deal with the land question in a responsible manner and this does not open the opportunity for people to resort to self-help measures where they will go and invade land and smash and grab land. That will not be allowed and is against the Constitution. We have proper legal measures that we can utilize.

Ramaphosa said the land reform programme needed to be reviewed but land seizures would not be tolerated.

The ruling ANC aims to amend the Constitution to allow for land expropriation without compensation to address racial disparities in land ownership which have persist more than two decades after apartheid’s demise in 1994.

President Ramaphosa outlined some of the issues and risks involved in the plan to parliament on Wednesday.

The ANC adopted a resolution in December to redistribute land to black South Africans without compensation. Parliament then backed a motion by opposition party Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) last month seeking to change the Constitution to allow for this. A committee will report back to the chamber by Aug 30.

Together, the ANC, the EFF and other opposition parties can muster the two-thirds majority needed for a Constitutional change, but it is not clear when, or if, a vote will take place.

South Africa has a history of colonial conquest and dispossession which pushed the black majority into crowded urban townships and rural reserves.

The 1913 Native Lands Act made it illegal for Africans to acquire land outside of these reserves, which became known as Homelands. While blacks account for 80 per cent of South Africa’s population, the homelands comprise just 13 per cent of the land. They are largely controlled by tribal authorities rather than ordinary residents and farmers.

Since the end of white minority rule in 1994, the ANC has followed a willing-seller, willing-buyer model whereby the government buys white-owned farms for redistribution to blacks. Progress has been slow.

Based on a survey of title deeds, the government says blacks own four per cent of private land, and only eight per cent of farmland has been transferred to blacks, well short of a target of 30 per cent that was meant to have been reached in 2014.

AgriSA, a farm industry group, says 27 per cent of farmland is in black hands. Its figure include State land and plots tilled by black subsistence farmers in the old homelands.

Ben Cousins, a professor in Agrarian Studies at the University of the Western Cape, has noted there are no estimates on private transactions involving black farmers who have purchased land themselves, so the data are incomplete.

There has been a parallel process of land claims by individuals or communities dispossessed under white rule, but most of the settlements have involved cash paid by the state instead of people reoccupying their land, and 87 per cent of the claims have been urban.

The 17 million people who reside in the former homelands, a third of the population, are mostly subsistence farmers working tiny plots and subject to customary law.

Critics of the ANC land policy say that instead of seizing farmland from whites, such households should be given title deeds, turning millions into property owners.

David Masondo, a member of the ANC’s Economic Transformation Committee, said last week the party was considering this, but it would face resistance from traditional leaders, a key ANC political base cultivated by former president Jacob Zuma.

A proposal by a panel headed former president Kgalema Mothlanthe to dissolve the Ingonyama Trust, which controls the land in the former Zulu homeland, was condemned by Zulu King Goodwill Zwelithini. Zwelithini is the custodian of the Trust, giving him wide powers to allocate land use.

Analysts say South Africa is unlikely to follow the route of Zimbabwe, where the seizure of white-owned farms under former president Robert Mugabe triggered economic collapse, in large part because most of the new farmers lacked capital for investment or experience with large-scale commercial agriculture.

Agriculture was the backbone of the economy and so there were ripple effects, with the undermining of property rights also shattering investor confidence.

Ramaphosa has said the policy will be undertaken in a way that does not threaten food security or economic growth and the ANC’s Masondo has said unused land will be the main target.

On Sunday Ramaphosa pointedly warned against land invasions. Still, the risks are substantial. South Africa feeds itself and is the continent’s largest maize producer and the world’s second-biggest exporter of citrus fruits.

Agriculture accounts for less than three percent of national output but employs around 850,000 people accounting for five per cent of the workforce. Threats to production would also fan food inflation, hurting lower-income households.

Wandile Sihlobo, an economist with the Agricultural Business Chamber, says the farm loan book is around 160 billion rand (about 14 billion US dollars), and if farmers could not repay loans there would be ripple effects across the economy.

Analysts say the ANC wants to appeal to poorer black voters, the core of the ANC’s support, ahead of elections next year. Ramaphosa has said he aims to resolve the issue of racial disparities in property ownership once and for all.

The EFF has made expropriation of land without compensations its clarion call. South Africa’s proportional representation system can make small parties such as the EFF kingmakers in tight elections. This was the case in 2016 when the EFF backed the opposition Democratic Alliance to run key metropolitan areas, including Johannesburg.

Source: NAM NEWS NETWORK